Community, diversity and the public good
I'm intending to
go along to this event and decided I would set out my thoughts on the
questions put so I will hopefully be able to give some cogent
answers. As always as a Humanist I have to admit that I can be wrong
and would therefore welcome comments below.
The Commission on Religion and
Belief in British Public Life: community, diversity and the public
good
12 March 2014, 3.30-5.30pm
The commission asks:
What are the foundations of a
democratic and diverse nation?
How is community identity formed in a
multi-faith society?
Should the freedom of religious
expression be limited?
How should religion and belief be
taught in state schools?
What lessons can Leicester share about
interfaith dialogue and action?
What are the foundations of a
democratic and diverse nation?
I think the word liberal is missing
here. Our liberties, established in the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights
1689 and the Human Rights Act, limit the power of the state over the
individual and in my view precede and take precedence over democracy.
These include the rule of law, free speech, freedom of thought and
religion together with freedom of association.
The power of democratic government has
to be limited in order to protect the individual. Hitler was
supported by a majority and this was a major motivation behind the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
A diverse nation is made up of diverse
individuals.
How is community identity formed in
a multi-faith society?
Diverse individuals should result in a
diverse society. In a healthy society we belong to multiple
communities. Religion cannot be the base for a sustainable society if
it attempts to monopolise community.
A Sikh
- attending the gurdwara
- going to Sikh schools
- working for Sikh businesses
- playing sport with other Sikhs
- living in a Sikh area of a city
- with only Sikh friends
In a plural and inclusive society
(which is what I believe must be our ambition) a Sikh might
- attend the gurdwara every week
- go to a community school attended by those of many religions and none
- work for a business where your religion is irrelevant
- play sport for any club that suits
- live in whatever part of the city suits his/her lifestyle
- have friends of multiple religions and beliefs.
Should the freedom of religious
expression be limited?
No more than for free speech. Shouting
“Fire” in a theater when there is no fire should be illegal.
Inciting violence should be illegal. Otherwise we have to accept that
free speech means that we have to be prepared to be offended and not
react. Without the ability to offend, the term free speech is
meaningless.
Accusing your opponent of causing you offence is a tactic, which allows you to avoid putting your own case, or pointing out the other’s flaws.
Accusing your opponent of causing you offence is a tactic, which allows you to avoid putting your own case, or pointing out the other’s flaws.
How should religion and belief be
taught in state schools?
Comparative religion should be taught
in state schools along side philosophy and critical thinking.
Children should understand the history of religious beliefs and the
main beliefs of those following the major religions, in order that
they can relate to followers and avoid causing unintended offence.
The inculcation of religion should be
the sole prerogative of parents and religious organisations.
What lessons can Leicester share
about interfaith dialogue and action?
The civil
authority must be agnostic and neutral with regard to religion
(secular) and encourage dialogue between all communities (which
includes all the groups that make up society).
Comments
Post a Comment